The missing statement and reason in the table is given below:
Statement Reason
1. ∠ABD ≅ ∠CDB; ∠ADB ≅ ∠CBD
Opposite angles in a parallelogram are congruent.
2. ΔABD ≅ ΔCDB
Side-Angle-Side (SAS) postulate of congruence. |
3. AB ≅ CD and BC ≅ AD
Corresponding parts of congruent triangles are congruent (CPCTC).
1. In a parallelogram, opposite sides are parallel by definition. Therefore, angle
is congruent to angle
and angle
is congruent to angle
because they are alternate interior angles formed by a transversal with two parallel lines.
2. We also know that side
is shared between triangles
and
, so it is congruent to itself by the reflexive property of equality.
3. With two angles and the side between them congruent (SAS), we can say that
is congruent to
.
4. Because the triangles are congruent, all corresponding parts are congruent. Therefore, side
is congruent to side
, and side
is congruent to side
, by CPCTC (Corresponding Parts of Congruent Triangles are Congruent).