Question

Consider this function comment. Which of the following options is recommended in your textbook? Computes the area of a cuboid. eparaml width the width of the cuboid eparam2 height the height of the cuboid eparam3 length the length of the cuboid ereturn the area of the cuboid double area(double width, double height, double length) double result - width +height 1ength; return result: A. The comments are adequate to describe the function. B. The lines need to end with semicolons like other C++ statements. C. The parameters should be described more completely. D. The eparaml, eparam2, eparam3 should be just eparam.

Answer 1

A. The comments are adequate to describe the function.

Step-by-step explanation:

C++ programming language comments starts with two forward-slash ("//") and can be written above a code statement or at the right-hand side of the code statements

The comments of the area() function with three parameters width, height, and length are adequate to describe the function as it does not need to end with a semi-colon.