Register
In the case of the U.S. Supreme Court cases ruled that requiring sentencing judges to consider facts that have not been proven to a jury violates the Constitution. A) Apprendi v. New Jersey B) Melendez
214k views
0 votes
In the case of the U.S. Supreme Court cases ruled that requiring sentencing

judges to consider facts that have not been proven to a jury violates the
Constitution.
A) Apprendi v. New Jersey
B) Melendez v. U.S.
C) Blakely v. Washington
OD) U.S. v. Booker

User Rlarroque
by
5.9k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

D.) United States v. Booker

Step-by-step explanation:

User TJ Mazeika
by
6.1k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

6.5m questions

8.7m answers

Other Questions

1. MIDTERM TEST Midterm 13. Which of the following gives the Constitution the final word in regards to this country's legal code?
Which constitutional amendment established birthright citizenship in the US? (please help)
The only person to serve two non-consecutive terms as u.S. President was known by what nickname?
When mixed with alcohol, a medication can become all of the following, except __________ . A. healthier B. useless C. unpredictable
Who is the petitioner and who is the respondent?
Link Copied!