Register
Does all art have to be committed to thinking, or can we admit artistic forms that do not have a concrete purpose? Please give me a full answer and with your real opinion!
106k views
6 votes
Does all art have to be committed to thinking, or can we admit artistic forms that do not have a concrete purpose?

Please give me a full answer and with your real opinion!

User PTwr
by
6.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

All art does not have to be committed to thinking. Art can indeed have purposes but not always. Art can be always made random; this type of art has the beauty of being randomly perceived differently by different types of people.

User Superluminal
by
6.0k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

6.5m questions

8.6m answers

Other Questions

In the first line from "o captain! my captain!" what does "our fearful trip"refer to? a. the civil war. b. the battles at antietam creek. c. the presidency. d. lincoln's life. is the answer a? thank you
What do scholars think the geometric shapes in the las caux cave paintings represtent
What skill(s) would be important for an art appraiser to have??
1086-05-01-01-00_files/i0260000.jpg The photograph above was produced by ______(1)______. The process he/she used is the same process used by ______(2)______ to create ______(3)______. a. (1) Ansel Adams;
Help!!!!! Which artistic style most resembles the fanciful, fictional, and historical subjects common to Pre-Raphaelite artwork? Realism Romanticism Naturalism Neoclassic
Link Copied!