Question

But do you think his scare tactics accomplished his real goal—improving the morality of the "sinners" and prompting religious revival? Are scare tactics still an effective persuasive method in today's world? What are some other alternatives to persuade people, or is fear the best method? Explain thoroughly

Answer 1

In 1095, scare tactics were used to motivate people to join the Crusades. Modern public speakers also rely on similar methods of persuasion. There are alternative methods of persuasion that can be more effective than fear.

Step-by-step explanation:

In 1095, preachers used scare tactics to motivate people to join the Crusades. These tactics included inspiring anger, fear, and fervor among the crowds. Modern public speakers also rely on similar methods of persuasion to change people's minds. They appeal to the audience's feelings, such as sympathy, anger, fear, insecurity, guilt, and conscience, to support their positions.

While scare tactics can be effective in certain situations, there are alternative methods of persuasion. Some other effective methods include appealing to reason and logic, providing evidence and examples, using storytelling and narratives, appealing to shared values and ideals, building trust and credibility, and creating a sense of belonging and community.

In today's world, fear is not always the best method of persuasion. It can lead to negative outcomes such as anxiety, paranoia, and divisiveness, and it may not result in lasting change. The most effective persuasive method depends on the context, the audience, and the specific goals of the communication.

Answer 2

This question is incomplete. Here's the complete question.

Read SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD , by Rev. Jonathan Edwards

There is no doubt that Edwards’ fiery sermon did instill fear and create hysteria among its original audience. The sermon continues to intimidate listeners and readers today. Certainly, Edwards succeeded in his scare tactics.

But do you think his scare tactics actually accomplished his real goal—improving the morality of the “sinners” and prompting religious revival?

Are scare tactics still an effective persuasive method in today’s world?

What are some other alternatives to persuade people, or is fear the best method?

Answer:

Although Edwards' sermon is still today considered as one of the catalysts for the First Great Awakening, is full of scare tactics such as a graphic description of Hell as real, which can make "sinners" repent out of fear, yet not out of a real improvement of their morality.

Step-by-step explanation:

Scare tactics, such as Edwards', are still being used today, especially in religion, despite its effectiveness decreasing. Fear is not the best tool for persuasion. People today feel more attracted to positive messages than negative ones, and persuasion is more effective when based on a more empathetic approach.