120k views
3 votes
Are the bill of rights necessary

User TorokLev
by
7.8k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

User Dequis
by
7.7k points
5 votes

Answer:

Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

User Thiago Lewin
by
8.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.