227k views
24 votes
What significance did weapons of mass destruction have in the U.S. invasion of Iraq?

A) So many weapons of mass destruction were discovered in Iraq that it took longer than anticipated to locate all of them.

B) President Bush threatened to use weapons of mass destruction if the air attack was unsuccessful.

C) Weapons of mass destruction played no part in the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

D) President Bush said that weapons of mass destruction existed there, but that proved not the case.

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer: the answer is D.) "President Bush said that weapons of mass destruction existed there, but that proved not the case."

Explanation: took the k12 quiz homeslice

10 votes

Answer:

D. President Bush said that weapons of mass destruction existed there, but that proved not the case.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Myl
by
3.4k points