139k views
16 votes
A valley in California has an elevation of feet below sea level. A valley in Arizona has an elevation lower than the one in California. Which of these could be the elevation of the valley in Arizona? 3 feet 0 feet -5 feet -9 feet

User Abahet
by
7.7k points

2 Answers

7 votes

Final answer:

Valleys below sea level are at negative elevations, so the elevation of the Arizona valley could be -5 feet or -9 feet which are lower (more negative) than a valley in California below sea level.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question asks about comparing elevations in terms of feet below sea level. To determine which of the given elevations could be lower than a valley in California, we must understand that lower elevations below sea level are represented by more negative numbers.

For example, if the California valley is at -2 feet below sea level, an elevation of -5 feet or -9 feet would be lower. Therefore, -5 feet and -9 feet are both possible elevations for the valley in Arizona, since they are lower (more negative) than -2 feet. However, 3 feet and 0 feet would not be possible since they are higher elevations (less negative or not negative at all) compared to anything below sea level.

In conclusion, the correct answer is -5 feet or -9 feet.

User Oleg Golovanov
by
8.2k points
5 votes

The valley in California has an elevation of feet "below sea level".
Below sea level means below 0 feet, so it'd have -5 feet

The one in Arizona would be lower than it, so the elevation will definitely be -9 feet

User Gurbela
by
7.8k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories