212k views
1 vote
Which of the following is a reason why historians may want to consider opinions as well as facts reported by a source?

A.
A source that historians trust is likely to have true opinions.

B.
The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.

C.
Examining opinions will reveal whether it is a primary or secondary source.

D.
The opinions will reveal the identity of the source.

User Tomak
by
5.1k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.

Step-by-step explanation:

When researching a material or topic, the historian would want to consider opinions because it might show how the person feels about it.

-kiniwih426

User Kgr
by
5.0k points
5 votes

Answer:

B. The opinions may provide clues to the source's feelings and possible bias.

Step-by-step explanation:

A reason that a historian may want to consider opinions, as well as facts as reported by a source, would be to make sure that the source is not biased and to know his true feelings because his emotions can cloud his judgment.

Therefore, the correct answer is B.

User Jokuskay
by
4.9k points