61.9k views
1 vote
Pls help. I rly don't understand it.​

Pls help. I rly don't understand it.​-example-1

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

You just need to demonstrate that the expression is not equivalent. To do that, we just need to evaluate the expression with a specific number.


(3)/(8)x+2 \\eq (3)/(2)x+5

For
x=0, we have


(3)/(8)(0)+2 \\eq (3)/(2)(0)+5\\2 \\eq 5

Notice that the answer is true because 2 is not equivalent to 5.

Therefore, the expression is actually non-equivalent.

User Cevaris
by
6.0k points