218k views
0 votes
A state legislator suspects that many businesses in the

state have been trying to avoid paying their taxes. She
launches an investigation of several companies and
discovers evidence that they intentionally lied on their tax
forms. She presents this evidence to a state prosecutor,
who charges the companies with tax fraud.
Which statement, if true, would most suggest that this situation illustrates a
concurrent power rather than a reserved power?
O A. The federal government charged the same companies for failin
to pay federal taxes,
a kB
O B. The companies charged with tax fraud were generally family
owned and based in one state.
O C. The legislator who began the investigation once worked for the
federal government.
D. The states case against the companies was thrown out of court
by a state judge

User Zakalwe
by
4.9k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer: . The companies charged with tax fraud were generally family owned and based in one state

Step-by-step explanation:

User Yuichi Kato
by
4.7k points
4 votes
B. The companies charged with tax fraud were generally family owned and based in one state
User Gimenete
by
4.6k points