menu
Qammunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
In the case Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic.&quo…
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
In the case Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic.&quo…
asked
Jan 18, 2021
188k
views
5
votes
In the case Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic." Which of the following rights was limited in this case?
Social Studies
high-school
Diogo Melo
asked
by
Diogo Melo
7.7k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
3
votes
Answer:
Freedom of speech.
Step-by-step explanation:
Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
Bafla
answered
Jan 24, 2021
by
Bafla
8.0k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
← Prev Question
Next Question →
Related questions
asked
Jun 22, 2024
198k
views
The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic. This quotation illustrates which of the following principles? a) Absolute freedom
Paul Woods
asked
Jun 22, 2024
by
Paul Woods
8.0k
points
History
high-school
1
answer
5
votes
198k
views
asked
Jan 28, 2024
111k
views
The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing a panic." Source: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court (1902-1932)
GrovesNL
asked
Jan 28, 2024
by
GrovesNL
7.6k
points
Social Studies
college
1
answer
3
votes
111k
views
asked
Nov 10, 2019
88.0k
views
In the case Schneck v. united states, justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote: "The most stringent protectoin of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing panic.
Lifu Tang
asked
Nov 10, 2019
by
Lifu Tang
8.0k
points
History
high-school
2
answers
2
votes
88.0k
views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
9.4m
questions
12.2m
answers
Other Questions
Who was the boy who became king at the age of 9?
Why did people immigrate to the United States in the late 1800s?
In the peaceful period of the Middle Kingdom, what area of culture thrived?
Why did the slogan Peace Land and Bread appeal to the Russian people?
Why wasn't New England's land well-suited for farming
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search Qammunity.org