Register
In the case Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic." Which of the following rights was
188k views
5 votes
In the case Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic." Which of the following rights was limited in this case?

User Diogo Melo
by
4.8k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer:

Freedom of speech.

Step-by-step explanation:

  • Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
  • However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
  • Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
User Bafla
by
5.2k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.7m questions

7.4m answers

Other Questions

Mr. Jensen repeatedly complains about the quality and duration of his sleep. He claims that he has difficulty falling asleep and staying asleep, and that he usually wakes up before it is time to get up.
Those rights that are so fundamental that they are outside of the authority of government to refulate are known as
Does the president of israel make all the decisions and rules for the country
In a speech to the British people, Churchill said the following: Let us brace ourselves to our duties and so bear ourselves that if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men
The term diaspora is mostly directly linked to what aspect of Judaism
Link Copied!