24.1k views
1 vote
Article 1: Convention Bosses
Is this a primary source? Explain.

User Gino
by
4.5k points

2 Answers

0 votes

Final answer:

The source 'Article 1: Convention Bosses' is likely a secondary source as it discusses historical events. For Mongol-related documents, key evidence and author perspective are important in evaluating the impact of the Mongols and assessing the reliability of sources, such as a letter from the Pope.

Step-by-step explanation:

Is the Source Primary or Secondary?

To determine whether the source 'Article 1: Convention Bosses' is a primary or secondary source, we need to consider the nature of the document. A primary source is an original document or record that was created contemporaneously with the events being described, providing direct evidence about it. In contrast, a secondary source interprets, analyzes, or summarizes information from primary sources. It seems that this article is likely a secondary source as it appears to analyze the historical development of U.S. political conventions over time.

User CathyQian
by
3.8k points
4 votes

Answer:

Before the French came to Indochina, Vietnam, the Khmer Empire (Cambodia), and the Laotian Kingdom (Laos) were independent countries. Vietnam had been ruled by neighboring China for hundreds of years, but after centuries of resistance the Vietnamese people overthrew their Chinese rulers and became independent.

User Thegreenogre
by
4.4k points