menu
QAmmunity.org
Login
Register
My account
Edit my Profile
Private messages
My favorites
Register
Ask a Question
Questions
Unanswered
Tags
Categories
Ask a Question
As a result of the Dred Scott case, the federal government...... a banned slave trading in Washington, DC b had no legal right to ban slavery c had to permit slavery in the northern states d allowed Nebraska
asked
Feb 16, 2021
5.5k
views
1
vote
As a result of the Dred Scott case, the federal government......
a
banned slave trading in Washington, DC
b
had no legal right to ban slavery
c
had to permit slavery in the northern states
d
allowed Nebraska to chose slavery through popular sovereignty
NEED HELPPP
History
middle-school
Jaiprakash Soni
asked
by
Jaiprakash Soni
4.0k
points
answer
comment
share this
share
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Please
log in
or
register
to answer this question.
1
Answer
2
votes
Answer:B. Had no legal righ to ban slavery
Step-by-step explanation:
Aliaksei Kliuchnikau
answered
Feb 20, 2021
by
Aliaksei Kliuchnikau
4.3k
points
ask related question
comment
share this
0 Comments
Please
log in
or
register
to add a comment.
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.
4.5m
questions
5.9m
answers
Other Questions
2) Why did Roman soldiers require Sturdy Sandals ? What are they made of?
What was the quarting act​
The text describes the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. According to the text, the event was designed to do what? A rally support for legislation forbidding discrimination by any defense contractors
Please help me 10 points
Name and explain at least three reasons why the colonies started to become angry at the English Government.
Twitter
WhatsApp
Facebook
Reddit
LinkedIn
Email
Link Copied!
Copy
Search QAmmunity.org