Register

As a result of the Dred Scott case, the federal government...... a banned slave trading in Washington, DC b had no legal right to ban slavery c had to permit slavery in the nort…

As a result of the Dred Scott case, the federal government...... a banned slave trading in Washington, DC b had no legal right to ban slavery c had to permit slavery in the nort…
5.5k views
1 vote
As a result of the Dred Scott case, the federal government......

a
banned slave trading in Washington, DC
b
had no legal right to ban slavery
c
had to permit slavery in the northern states
d
allowed Nebraska to chose slavery through popular sovereignty
NEED HELPPP

User Jaiprakash Soni
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:B. Had no legal righ to ban slavery

Step-by-step explanation:

User Aliaksei Kliuchnikau
by
8.3k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
Why  might  things far away  and  long  ago  be   important   to  us now.
What military strategy defeated Cornwallis at Yorktown?
After 1081 ,what was the byzantine being weakened by?
Link Copied!