56.9k views
3 votes
5. Kevin, the star football player, was walking home late one night after practice when he decided to take a shortcut. He walked through his neighbor’s backyard, who called the police on him for trespassing. Kevin was found guilty and was sentenced to 10 years in prison. What amendment might Kevin argue was just violated? Why?

User Darkownage
by
3.5k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

Kevin might argue that his rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment were violated.

Step-by-step explanation:

Kevin might argue that his rights guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment were violated. The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. In Kevin's case, his neighbor called the police on him for trespassing, leading to his arrest and subsequent conviction. Kevin could argue that his neighbor's call to the police and the subsequent arrest and conviction were all based on an unreasonable search and seizure.Kevin, the football player, might argue that the Eighth Amendment was violated. The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishments. A 10-year prison sentence for merely trespassing seems exceptionally harsh and disproportionate to the offense, which typically would not warrant such a severe punishment. This could potentially be seen as a cruel and unusual punishment, thus violating the Eighth Amendment.

User Denis Masyukov
by
3.3k points