Final answer:
The Cherokee Nation has historically had the right to enforcement of treaty terms through the U.S. legal system, but enforcement of these rights has been met with challenges, such as the Trail of Tears following the Treaty of New Echota. Today, if treaty rights are violated, tribes can pursue legal avenues to seek justice and federal enforcement of treaties.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the terms of a treaty with the Cherokee are violated, historically, the Cherokee Nation had the right to seek protection and enforcement of the treaty terms through the U.S. legal system. In the landmark case of Worcester v. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states could not impose their laws on Cherokee lands, confirming the sovereignty of the Cherokee Nation and their right to self-governance. However, the implementation of the Court's decision was problematic, with President Andrew Jackson and the state of Georgia ignoring the ruling, leading to the forcible removal of the Cherokee people along the Trail of Tears.
Following the Treaty of New Echota, a minority within the Cherokee Nation, the Treaty Party, agreed to cede their lands east of the Mississippi River in exchange for land in Indian Territory and other compensations. However, the majority, led by Principal Chief John Ross, contested the treaty, arguing it was fraudulently made by an unauthorized party. Eventually, the U.S. government enforced the removal, resulting in the death of thousands of Cherokee people during the relocation to what is now Oklahoma.
Under current U.S. law, Native American tribes including the Cherokee, retain certain sovereign rights. If modern treaty rights are violated, tribes can pursue legal action and demand federal intervention to uphold the treaties, which are considered the supreme law of the land alongside the Constitution.