120k views
4 votes
​Historically, the percentage of residents of a certain country who support stricter gun control laws has been 54%. A recent poll of 906 people showed 504 in favor of stricter gun control laws. Assume the poll was given to a random sample of people. Test the claim that the proportion of those favoring stricter gun control has charged. Perform a hypothesis test, using significance level of 0.05

User Sturoid
by
4.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:


z=\frac{0.556 -0.54}{\sqrt{(0.54(1-0.54))/(906)}}=0.966


p_v =2*P(z>0.966)=0.334

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given
\alpha=0.05 we have
p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of people in favor of stricter gun control laws is not significantly different from 0.54 or 54%

Explanation:

Data given and notation

n=906 represent the random sample taken

X=504 represent the people in favor of stricter gun control laws


\hat p=(504)/(906)=0.556 estimated proportion of people in favor of stricter gun control laws


p_o=0.54 is the value that we want to test


\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)


p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)

Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is different from 0.54 or no:

Null hypothesis:
p=0.54

Alternative hypothesis:
p \\eq 0.54

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:


z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{(p_o (1-p_o))/(n)}} (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion
\hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value
p_o.

Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:


z=\frac{0.556 -0.54}{\sqrt{(0.54(1-0.54))/(906)}}=0.966

Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided
\alpha=0.05. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:


p_v =2*P(z>0.966)=0.334

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given
\alpha=0.05 we have
p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the proportion of people in favor of stricter gun control laws is not significantly different from 0.54 or 54%

User Serdar Ozler
by
4.1k points