132k views
3 votes
Here are summary statistics for randomly selected weights of newborn​ girls: nequals233​, x overbarequals30.3 ​hg, sequals7.1 hg. Construct a confidence interval estimate of the mean. Use a 99​% confidence level. Are these results very different from the confidence interval 28.5 hgless thanmuless than32.9 hg with only 15 sample​ values, x overbarequals30.7 ​hg, and sequals2.8 ​hg?

User Khanmizan
by
5.2k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

n =233


30.3-2.60(7.1)/(√(233))=29.09


30.3+2.60(7.1)/(√(233))=31.51

So on this case the 99% confidence interval would be given by (29.09;31.51)

n=15


30.7-2.98(2.8)/(√(15))=28.54


30.7+2.98(2.8)/(√(15))=32.85

So on this case the 99% confidence interval would be given by (28.54;32.85)

So the margin of error for the first case is :


Me= (31.51-29.09)/(2)= 1.21

And for the second case we got:


Me= (32.85-28.54)/(2)= 2.155

So we can see that if we increase the sample size the margin of error is significantly lower

Explanation:

Previous concepts

A confidence interval is "a range of values that’s likely to include a population value with a certain degree of confidence. It is often expressed a % whereby a population means lies between an upper and lower interval".

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".


\bar X represent the sample mean for the sample


\mu population mean (variable of interest)

s represent the sample standard deviation

n represent the sample size

Solution to the problem

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:


\bar X \pm t_(\alpha/2)(s)/(√(n)) (1)

In order to calculate the critical value
t_(\alpha/2) we need to find first the degrees of freedom, given by:


df=n-1=233-1=232

Since the Confidence is 0.99 or 99%, the value of
\alpha=0.01 and
\alpha/2 =0.005, and we can use excel, a calculator or a table to find the critical value. The excel command would be: "=-T.INV(0.005,232)".And we see that
t_(\alpha/2)=2.60

Now we have everything in order to replace into formula (1):


30.3-2.60(7.1)/(√(233))=29.09


30.3+2.60(7.1)/(√(233))=31.51

So on this case the 99% confidence interval would be given by (29.09;31.51)

For the other info provided we have this:


df=n-1=15-1=14

Since the Confidence is 0.99 or 99%, the value of
\alpha=0.01 and
\alpha/2 =0.005, and we can use excel, a calculator or a table to find the critical value. The excel command would be: "=-T.INV(0.005,14)".And we see that
t_(\alpha/2)=2.98

Now we have everything in order to replace into formula (1):


30.7-2.98(2.8)/(√(15))=28.54


30.7+2.98(2.8)/(√(15))=32.85

So on this case the 99% confidence interval would be given by (28.54;32.85)

So the margin of error for the first case is :


Me= (31.51-29.09)/(2)= 1.21

And for the second case we got:


Me= (32.85-28.54)/(2)= 2.155

So we can see that if we increase the sample size the margin of error is significantly lower

User Tornseglare
by
5.2k points