Question

Write a paragraph that supports or refutes this statement Süleyman I was cruel leader who was more interested in expanding his empire than in protecting or providing for his subjects

Answer 1

Süleyman I, also known as Süleyman the Magnificent, was a complex leader who expanded the Ottoman Empire while also making significant cultural and legal advancements. His rule had instances of cruelty, but it is crucial to consider the geopolitical context and the empire's defense needs during that time.

Step-by-step explanation:

Süleyman I, also known as Süleyman the Magnificent, was a leader of the Ottoman Empire who reigned from 1520 to 1566. While he was known for expanding the empire's territory and achieving military success, it is important to examine his rule in a nuanced manner. Süleyman's reign saw advancements in arts, culture, and the development of the legal system. However, there were instances of cruelty, such as the execution of his eldest son and the large number of deaths during the sieges of Belgrade and Rhodes.

It's worth noting that Süleyman's expansionist policies were not solely driven by personal ambitions, but also by the geopolitical context of the time. The Ottoman Empire was surrounded by powerful rivals, such as the Safavids and the Habsburgs, who posed significant threats. As a result, Süleyman's priorities included protecting the empire and maintaining its dominance in the region. While there were instances of cruelty during his reign, it is essential to explore the entirety of his rule to have a comprehensive understanding of Süleyman I as a leader.

Answer 2

Machiavelli claims that a leader must find a balance between a temperate and a cruel attitude to be successful. He makes a very effective argument. First, he uses deductive reasoning by stating a conclusion that he uses to prove his point. He says that if a leader is not cruel, his subjects will rebel and no one will obey the law. Second, his evidence is compelling. Machiavelli uses historical examples to support his ideas, which are clear and interesting to read. Finally, he uses sophisticated diction, creating a serious tone that provides a sense of authority. His reasoning, evidence, and diction all work together to support his claim, making his argument both horrifying and effective.

Step-by-step explanation: