Answer:
Statement (2) is sufficient.
Explanation:
Here, m, r, x and y are positive numbers,
We have to check :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e394c/e394c8e576809744fbc02db90cbaf415ac7ccf38" alt="(m)/(r)=(x)/(y)"
Statement (1) :
The ratio of m to y is equal to the ratio of x to r,
i.e.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b985/8b98525dfbddee4fb3eca795726eff0cfc4eca6f" alt="(m)/(y)=(x)/(r)"
( By cross multiplication )
Thus, statement (1) is not sufficient.
Statement (2) :
The ratio of m + x to r + y is equal to the ratio of x to y
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d94e4/d94e433009a8bd00620c31254241df7dcd7b1b3c" alt="(m+x)/(r+y)=(x)/(y)"
By cross multiplication,
y(m+x) = x(r+y)
By distributive property,
ym + yx = xr + xy
Using subtracting property of equality,
ym = xr
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e394c/e394c8e576809744fbc02db90cbaf415ac7ccf38" alt="(m)/(r)=(x)/(y)"
Hence, proved...
i.e. statement (2) is sufficient.