Register
The final ruling of the Dred Scott case stated escaped slaves in the North could remain there slaves could suit for their freedom slaves had rights according to the Constitution slaves were property and
120k views
2 votes
The final ruling of the Dred Scott case stated escaped slaves in the North could remain there slaves could suit for their freedom slaves had rights according to the Constitution slaves were property and had no Constitutional rights.​

The final ruling of the Dred Scott case stated escaped slaves in the North could remain-example-1
User JBibbs
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

10 votes

Answer:

D. Slaves were property and had no Constitutional rights.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Oliver Robie
by
8.3k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Bhadra
asked Apr 7, 2024 158k views
Who was Dred Scott? a. an escaped enslaved person b. a person seeking freedom c. an army officer
Bhadra asked Apr 7, 2024
by Bhadra
7.8k points
1 answer
5 votes
158k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.5m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Link Copied!