Question

9. In paragraphs 13 and 14, Wallace discusses the concept of worship, claiming, “There is no such thing as not worshipping.” Do you agree? Do you think that he risked offending members of his audience in his use of worship to mean something other than traditional religions? Why or why not?

Answer 1

I do not agree. I do, however, think that he risked offending members in his audience in his use of worship because different people have their own point of views. You can't exactly say that someone's opinion is wrong if that is what they believe in. And aside from that, people just have different religions. So, honestly, they have the right to worship or not.

Answer 2

I do agree with this because everyone puts their belief in something. Whether it is a god, a symbol, money, materialistic items, etc. I do think that he risked offending some members of his audience just because everyone has different beliefs and viewpoints. Many people are very serious about their religion and can easily take offense to say that things other than religions could be worshipped.

Step-by-step explanation: