12.1k views
1 vote
g A manufacturer of nickel-hydrogen batteries randomly selects 100 nickel plates for test cells, cycles them a specified number of times, and determines that 11 of the plates have blistered. Does this provide compelling evidence for concluding that more than 10% of all plates blister under such circumstances

User Ttmt
by
7.7k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Complete Question

A manufacturer of nickel-hydrogen batteries randomly selects 100 nickel plates for test cells, cycles them a specified number of times, and determines that 11 of the plates have blistered. Does this provide compelling evidence for concluding that more than 10% of plates blister under such circumstances?

A) State H_0 and H_a, (5 pts)

B) Test the hypothesis using the P-Value approach at a significance level of 4%: (15 pts)

Expert Answer

Answer:

a)
H_0:p=0.10


H_a:p>0.10

b) We fail to reject Null hypothesis

Explanation:

From the question we are told that:

Sample size n=100

No. with blistered x=11

a)

Generally the Hypothesis given as


H_0:p=0.10


H_a:p>0.10

b)

Since p=0.10

Therefore


p'=(11)/(100)


p'=0.11

Test statistics


Z=(p'-p)/(√(p(1-p)))


Z=(0.11-0.10)/(√(0.10*0.90/100))


Z=1.33

From table


P-Value =0.092

Therefore

P-value >0.04 significance level

Hence,We cannot conclude that at
4\% significance level the proportion is greater than
10\%

We fail to reject Null hypothesis

User Merry
by
8.2k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories