Question

Sample response: I think that Michael Alvarado's conviction should have been overturned, not upheld by the Supreme Court. Even though he was not told he was under arrest or in custody, his belief that he was in custody was reasonable. This was especially true given his age. Therefore, he was entitled to his Miranda rights and should have been read his Miranda warning.

Which of these ideas are included in your response? Check all that apply.
O whether you agree or disagree with Alvarado's conviction
O an explanation for your decision
O an explanation of the case's connection to Miranda​

Answer 1

Answer: 1. whether you agree or disagree with Alvarado’s conviction

2. the explanation for your decision

3. explanation of the case’s connection to Miranda

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

Step-by-step explanation:

life goes on