Answer:
The historical context refers to people judging by their time standards.
There is no different historical context from the textual one. When taken out of context, it is often difficult to properly understand a quote. The same goes for the events of history.
Step-by-step explanation:
Therefore, Mr. Vatco gives the background to 'the Crusades' to 'fighting for our god.' It leaves out both contexts and events, a good example of historical lack.
Although the Crusades were certainly religious, mass hysteria, anti-Semitism, random violence (against Christians, Jews, and Muslims) and pure profit were also part of the other components. The First Crusade established several Christian principalities in the Levant after the usual pillage and mass killing. But they were not just Christians: in an orthodox, Muslim, and Jewish environment they were Roman Catholic Principalities.
Then were the ruthless carriers of the Child Crusade and the Fourth Crusade, which wrecked the Byzantine empire at the end of the journey. It was the same empire that gave the first crossing the pretext.
The historical background is something from history that you need to understand. It's the very thing of history on a very real level.