Question

Two physics students are arguing about superconductors and their discovery, Jeffe says that he can use a

thermometer and a plug that generates electric current to mimic the experiment and make a superconductor since the
thermometer contains mercury. Sigorne says that he is wrong. Who should win the argument?
O Sigorne, because Jeffe can't use mercury to create a superconductor
O Sigorne, because Jeffe would have to cool the mercury as well
O Jeffe, because he has all of the materials to make a superconductor
O Jeffe, because superconductors are simple to make as long as there is a metal and a current

Answer 1

B on edge2020-2021

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

Sigorne wins the argument as Jeffe's proposal overlooks the crucial aspect of cooling required for superconductivity.

Sigorne should win the argument. While Jeffe's idea involves using a thermometer with mercury and an electric current source, it reflects a misunderstanding of the conditions required for superconductivity. Superconductors typically exhibit their properties at extremely low temperatures, often close to absolute zero. Using a thermometer and an electric current alone won't be sufficient to create a superconductor, as cooling is a crucial factor.

Mercury, indeed, can become a superconductor, but only at temperatures below its critical temperature. Jeffe's approach lacks the necessary cooling element to achieve superconductivity. Sigorne is correct in asserting that Jeffe would need to cool the mercury as well, making the experiment more complex than initially suggested.

In summary, Sigorne wins the argument as Jeffe's proposal overlooks the crucial aspect of cooling required for superconductivity.