229k views
19 votes
A geologist observes rock layers that are folded. She determines that a layer of siltstone is younger than the layer of limestone above it. What conclusion can you draw from the geologist's findings? Explain .

User Drpng
by
8.7k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Final answer:

The conclusion is that the siltstone and limestone layers were originally deposited horizontally, and a geological event caused the folding after their formation. The folding indicates a syncline, which suggests a geological event affecting a continuous sequence of sediment.

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the geologist's observation that the layer of siltstone is younger than the layer of limestone above it in folded rock layers, we can conclude that a geological event occurred after the layers were formed. This is in line with the principle of original horizontality, which states that sedimentary rocks are originally deposited in a horizontal manner, and any folding or tilting occurs after the deposition.

Furthermore, if in a stratigraphic sequence, the rocks get younger towards the inside of a fold, it indicates the fold is a syncline. This can also be an example of the principle of lateral continuity, implying that the folding event occurred post the formation of the layers and affected a continuous and previously undisturbed sedimentary sequence.

User AndMarkus
by
9.5k points
7 votes

Answer:

the findings are incorrect.

Step-by-step explanation:

the geologists finding are incorrect because the layers of soil which is far a way from the sirface of earths is the oldest layer.

was it correct sir?

User Subodh Bisht
by
8.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.