229k views
7 votes
What did not lead to the development of the Industrial Revolution in England?

O John McAdams better roads
Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations
O James Watt's steam engine
O Thomas Edison's electric light bulb

2 Answers

6 votes

Final answer:

Thomas Edison's electric light bulb did not lead to the development of the Industrial Revolution in England. This invention came later and had a greater impact on the Second Industrial Revolution, especially in the United States.

Step-by-step explanation:

The development of the Industrial Revolution in England was not influenced by Thomas Edison's electric light bulb. James Watt's steam engine, improved roads, and Adam Smith's The Wealth of Nations all significantly contributed to the Industrial Revolution. Watt's steam engine revolutionized production and transportation, better roads facilitated trade and communication, and Adam Smith's ideas encouraged economic growth and innovation. In contrast, Edison's electric light bulb was a later invention that emerged during the rise of electricity's use in the late nineteenth century, primarily affecting the Second Industrial Revolution, more so in the United States than in England during the earlier phase of industrialization.

User Samran
by
3.9k points
6 votes

Answer:

i believe the answer is the wealth of nations.

User Jeremy Vanderburg
by
4.6k points