Question

Hi so is someone up to doing my homework for me... if u going to waste my points then kindly p!ss off

Triangle Factory Fire, part 2 (Zachary Kent)

You’ve now read two accounts of a disaster that occured a century ago. If a similar fire were to start in a garment factory today, how might the events be the same or different?


What was true of factories in New York City before the Triangle Factory Fire?


What changes occurred in the aftermath of the tragedy? Within what time period did the changes happen?


Reread lines 15-28. How and why did the jurors’ viewpoint differ from that of angry citizens?


Reread the last sentence. Despite the horror and loss of life caused by the fire, how might it have been a useful experience, according to the author?


What is the author’s tone?


COMPARING TEXTS:
Which of the two texts would you use to research the effects of the Triangle Fire? Why?


Look back at both texts to find mentions of Frances Perkins. Why is she an important person to know about?


What kinds of sources did both authors use in researching this topic?


Reread lines 126-130 from Flesh & Blood So Cheap. Are these lines an example of author Albert Marrin’s perspective? Explain why or why not.


Reread lines 36-38 from The Story of the Triangle Factory Fire. What clues do you see in these lines to Zachary Kent’s attitude about the conditions that are described.


What idea presented by both authors is most relevant to us today? Why?


The two historical writings cover different aspects of the same event. Briefly review each text for its key details. Then tell what each selection emphasizes.

Answer 1

Thanks for the points. :) teehee

Answer 2

The Triangle Factory Fire of 1911 exposed dire working conditions in garment factories, prompting post-tragedy reforms. While both texts cover aspects of the event, "Flesh & Blood So Cheap" delves deeper into societal impacts, while "The Story of the Triangle Factory Fire" emphasizes personal experiences. Frances Perkins' pivotal role in labor reforms is crucial to understand from both texts.

Step-by-step explanation:

In a contemporary garment factory fire, similarities might persist in insufficient safety measures despite advancements in technology. Pre-Triangle Factory Fire, New York City factories operated under deplorable conditions with minimal safety regulations. Post-disaster changes rapidly ensued, introducing new labor laws and safety protocols.

The jurors' viewpoint, influenced by legal considerations, contrasted with the public's emotional response to the tragedy, leading to differing perspectives. The author implies that the fire, while tragic, prompted advancements in workplace safety practices.

The tone of the text remains factual and informative, devoid of overt emotions or bias. Comparing the texts, "Flesh & Blood So Cheap" might be preferable for researching the effects of the Triangle Fire due to its comprehensive coverage. Frances Perkins, mentioned in both texts, is pivotal for her role in implementing labor reforms after the fire. Authors used various sources, evident from the detailed accounts.

Lines from both texts reflect the authors' perspectives and attitudes towards the tragic conditions described. Today, the idea of workplace safety resonates, emphasized by both authors, emphasizing the need for improved safety measures. Each text emphasizes different aspects: "Flesh & Blood So Cheap" focuses on societal impacts, while "The Story of the Triangle Factory Fire" emphasizes personal narratives and experiences.