Gilbert's view on reality suggests that it is a complex construct that humans strive to understand but can never fully capture, resonating with themes in literature such as Gilman's advocacy and Smith's discussions on identity and prejudice.
The speech reveals that Gilbert perceives reality as something complex and not fully grasped by humans, aligning with the ideas of American pragmatist Charles Sanders Pierce. This perspective implies a multi-faceted view of reality, where humans develop better understandings over time but can never fully capture its essence.
This idea echoes throughout various literary techniques and narratives explored in the texts mentioned, such as the psychological and societal commentary in Gilman's work, the examination of prejudice and identity in Smith's ethos, and the metaphor of the cave in Glaucon's account. All these writers use rhetorical strategies to challenge conventional expectations and advocate for a deeper exploration of reality and personal experience.
In conclusion, the speech suggests that Gilbert, much like the writers discussed, uses literature to question and expand our understanding of reality, recognizing its complexity and the limitations of human perception.