Answer:
It's a rectangle, but not a rhombus (or square).
Explanation:
Let's see the vectors of each next vertex:
![Q - P = (4, 5) - (-5, 2) = (9, 3)\\R - Q = (6, -1) - (4, 5) = (2, -6)\\S - R = (-3, -4) - (6, -1) = (-9, -3)\\P - S = (-5, 2) - (-3, -4) = (-2, 6)\\](https://img.qammunity.org/2022/formulas/mathematics/high-school/4505342px76niyssf2oszvis7kxwwkmipn.png)
Firstly, we can notice that it's a parallelogram - because the Q-P side is parallel to the S - R side (if the x:y ratios are the same, the sides are parallel).
A rhombus needs the sides to be of the same length. But the length of a (x, y) vector is
and
, we don't even have to compute it exactly. If it's not a rhombus, it's also not a square (every square is a rhombus).
The last thing left is to know if it's a rectangle - for it to be a rectangle, we need to check if the vectors are perpendicular.
We can compute the dot product of the vectors - perpendicular vectors always have a dot product equal to zero. The dot product of two vectors
and
is equal to
.
![(9, 3) \cdot (2, -6) = 9\cdot 2 + 3\cdot(-6) = 18 - 18 = 0](https://img.qammunity.org/2022/formulas/mathematics/high-school/lrp6i5edxjocvpg0k8w1uq369a4vglqgba.png)
So the sides are perpendicular, and as such - the figure is a rectangle.