Question

Do you think restricting voting to citizens aged 18 and over fails the strict scrutiny test for

equal protection under the law? Why or why not?

Answer 1

Restricting voting to citizens aged 18 and over does not fail the strict scrutiny test for equal protection under the law. Age is a reasonable and objective criterion to determine eligibility for voting, as it correlates with the necessary maturity, knowledge, and responsibility to make informed decisions that affect the country's governance.

Step-by-step explanation:

Restricting voting to citizens aged 18 and over does not fail the strict scrutiny test for equal protection under the law. The strict scrutiny test requires that a law must serve a compelling government interest and be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest. The restriction is justified by the government's interest in ensuring that voters have the necessary maturity, knowledge, and responsibility to make informed decisions that affect the country's governance. Age is a reasonable and objective criterion to determine eligibility for voting, as it correlates with the attainment of these qualities.

Answer 2

Answer: No

Explanation: Strict scrutiny will often be invoked in an equal protection claim. For a court to apply strict scrutiny, the legislature must either have passed a law that infringes upon a fundamental right or involves a suspect classification. Suspect classifications include race, national origin, religion, and alienage.