180k views
2 votes
CU

Which of the following is not an argument in favor of drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR)?
A) New oil facilities will bring jobs and money to Alaska.
B) The land area affected will be small relative to the total area.
C) The oil will help the United States become less dependent on imported oil.
D) Developing domestic oil reserves will reduce the cost of oil.
E) Money from exported oil could be used to benefit the refuge's wildlife conservation efforts.

User Nastassia
by
3.3k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

C) The US needs to be less dependent on foreign oil.

Step-by-step explanation:

edge 2021

User Alfred Godoy
by
3.6k points
3 votes

Answer:

B) The land area affected will be small relative to the total area.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that the argument in favor is generally referred to as advantages it provides.

Hence, in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), and considering the available options.

The correct answer is "The land area affected will be small relative to the total area."

This is because the statement is not an advantage of drilling oil, but rather just a statement.

User Mohammed Yasin
by
3.5k points