Question

Which two are examples of checks and balances in the legislative process?

Answer 1

Two examples of checks and balances in the legislative process are Congress' ability to override a presidential veto and the bicameral requirement for both houses of Congress to pass a bill. The override serves as a check on the executive branch, while the need for both chambers to agree serves as an internal check within the legislative branch.

Step-by-step explanation:

Examples of checks and balances in the legislative process include the ability of Congress to override a presidential veto and the requirement for both houses of Congress to pass a bill. The first example highlights the ability of Congress to check the president's veto power by voting to pass the bill again with a two-thirds supermajority if it had been vetoed by the President.

This ensures that the legislative branch has a means of asserting its authority even against the executive branch's objections. The second example illustrates the bicameral nature of Congress, where a proposed bill must gain majority approval in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, serving as a check within the legislative branch itself. This process prevents a bill from becoming law without a consensus between both chambers.

Answer 2

The definition of checks and balancesis simply a system for distributing governmental powers. Each branch of the government has specific procedures only they can follow that help protect against fraud, errors, and illegal actions. These special procedures are distributed as evenly as possible so no one segment has ultimate power or more power than any other. A system of checks and balances can be found in almost any constitutional government, not just in the United States.

Step-by-step explanation: