Register
Should the constitution have been ratified without the bill of rights?
82.8k views
2 votes
Should the constitution have been ratified without the bill of rights?

User ANJYR
by
4.1k points

2 Answers

2 votes
Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.
User Edin Omeragic
by
3.0k points
3 votes
.......................No
User JohnDizzle
by
3.5k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

3.5m questions

4.4m answers

Other Questions

Given several pollution sources within a given region. You have determined the level of pollutants that the environment can tolerate and need to design a regulatory system that guarantees that tis limit
A two-year-old child has a pet dog named Sophie. The child visits her neighbor and sees the neighbor's pet dog. Even though the neighbor's dog is larger and of a different color, the child points to it
Unilateral Contract:_________. A) Contract agreed to orally or in writing. B) Contract in which both parties make promises to perform; a promise is given in return for another's promise. C) A contract
A marker used to identify a person in a photo is called: A. a download B. a tag. C. TMI. D. "friending."
Why does laughter seem to qualify as a biological functions?
Link Copied!