Answer:
This decision was significant because it recognized that Indigenous peoples have a legal right to their land, and that it cannot be taken from them without their consent.
Step-by-step explanation:
This ruling was based on the principle of the "discovery doctrine," which held that Indigenous peoples had a "right of occupancy" to their land, but that they did not have the same legal rights as European settlers.
The impact of this decision on the removal of Indigenous people from their land was mixed. On the one hand, the ruling provided some legal protection for Indigenous groups and helped to prevent their land from being taken without their consent. However, it did not stop the government from forcibly removing Indigenous people from their land, and many Indigenous groups were still forced to leave their homes and move to reservations.
Overall, the Supreme Court's decision in Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an important milestone in the recognition of Indigenous land rights, but it did not prevent the forced removal of Indigenous people from their land. The struggle for Indigenous land rights continued throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, and it remains an important issue in American politics today.