Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Option B is more emphatic than option A because it provides more specific and concrete information about the potential impact of a budget increase. In option B, the speaker states that a budget increase of $70,000 would enable the hiring of two new people, which is a specific and tangible benefit. In contrast, option A simply states that a budget increase would "improve hiring" without providing any details about how much of an improvement would be expected or how many new hires would be possible.
Additionally, option B provides a specific amount for the budget increase, which makes it more concrete and tangible than the general statement in option A. The use of a specific number also adds emphasis and weight to the argument being made.
Overall, option B is more emphatic because it provides more specific and concrete information about the potential impact of a budget increase, which makes the argument more compelling and persuasive.