Register
What was one effect of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case? It strengthened the legal protections for slavery. It weakened the legal protections for slavery. It weakened the abolitionist
232k views
23 votes
What was one effect of the Supreme Court's ruling in the Scott v. Sandford case?

It strengthened the legal protections for slavery.

It weakened the legal protections for slavery.

It weakened the abolitionist movement.

It strengthened the Missouri Compromise.

User Alex Szatmary
by
4.2k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

A is right got it right on edge

Step-by-step explanation:

bcuz

User Bart Cubrich
by
4.8k points
6 votes

Answer:

It strengthened the legal protections of slavery

Step-by-step explanation:

User Sergi Juanati
by
4.2k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

4.5m questions

5.9m answers

Other Questions

Which country did the Soviets provide aid to during the Cold War?
2) Why did Roman soldiers require Sturdy Sandals ? What are they made of?
The clause in the 14th Amendment, "...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. .." has been used to __________ A. provide for the common defense
Why do you think Hannibal attacked mostly city states that were by the coastline?
The text describes the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. According to the text, the event was designed to do what? A rally support for legislation forbidding discrimination by any defense contractors
Link Copied!