Answer:
9. 90°
10. 36°
11. 54°
12. cannot be determined
13. 182 +70√2 ≈ 281 units
14. T, T, T, T, T, F
Explanation:
The diagonals of a kite cross at right angles, so all angles at H in the first figure are 90°. The longer diagonal bisects the vertex angles at either end of it. Of course, the acute angles in each right triangle are complements of each other. The vertex angles at either end of the short diagonal are congruent, and may be acute, right, or obtuse. As in any quadrilateral, the sum of angles is 360°.
__
9. ∠BHY = 90°, the angle where the diagonals cross
10. ∠RKH = 36°, congruent to ∠BKH
11. ∠HBK = 54°, complementary to ∠BKH
12. ∠RYB = unknown. None of the angles in ΔRYB can be determined from given information, except to say that ΔRYH ≅ ΔBYH and the angles at H are right angles.
__
13. The side lengths can be determined from the Pythagorean theorem (or your knowledge of triangles). ΔEBN has side ratios of 5:12:13, with a scale factor of 7, so EN = 7·13 = 91. ΔIBN has side ratios of 1:1:√2, with a scale factor of 35, so IN = 35√2. The perimeter is twice the sum of these lengths, since the symmetrically opposite sides are the same lengths.
P = 2(91 +35√2) = 182 +70√2 ≈ 281 units
Using the Pythagorean theorem:
EN² = EB² +BN² = 84² +35² ⇒ EN = √8281 = 91
IN² = BI² +BN² = 35² +35² ⇒ IN = √2450 = 35√2 ≈ 49.497
__
14.
- True, opposite angles may be supplementary
- True, consecutive angles may be supplementary if the kite is a rhombus (opposite sides are parallel)
- True, opposite angles may be acute
- True, consecutive angles may be obtuse (an example is shown in the figure of problem 13, if the given dimensions are ignored)
- True, opposite angles may be complementary.
- False. Consecutive angles of a kite may not be complementary. (If they were, the figure would be a "dart".)