Final answer:
Debate suggests democracy is favored over military rule because it has shown to provide better outcomes for countries, allows citizens to vote, and holds leaders accountable. Despite its imperfections, democracy is preferred for promoting public interest and ensuring governmental checks and balances.
Step-by-step explanation:
Debate: Is Democracy Better than Military Rule?
Deliberating on whether democracy is superior to other forms of governance, one may refer to the contemplations of political thinkers over time. Winston Churchill, for instance, acknowledged democracy's imperfections but regarded it as the best among the tried systems. The instrumental defense of democracy proposes that it is not only a noteworthy end but also essential for governments to demonstrate their worth over time through beneficial consequences for the populace.
Democratic governments are often associated with wealthier nations and a higher likelihood of addressing the needs of their citizens due to the electoral process. On the upside, democracies allow citizens the power to vote and influence the direction of their government, contrastingly, military rule often arises from a belief that a strong hand is needed in times of chaos, disregarding the constitutional process.
Arguments against military rule include its tendency to support the interests of a powerful elite and often emerge as responses to the perceived incompetence of democratically elected officials. However, a democratic process ensures a check on governmental power and fosters a sense of collective responsibility among citizens for the decisions of their elected representatives. Thus, democracy, with all its flaws, remains a system that values public interest and strives towards equality.