Final answer:
The Battle of Gonzales in the Texas Revolution compares best to the Battle of Lexington and Concord in the American Revolution because both mark the locations where the first shots of their respective wars were fired, signaling the start of hostilities.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Battle of Gonzales and the Battle of Lexington and Concord Comparison
The Battle of Gonzales in the Texas Revolution is best compared to D) Lexington and Concord in the American Revolution because it was where the first shots of the war were fired. Like the skirmish at Lexington and Concord, which started the American Revolution, the Battle of Gonzales marked the beginning of the Texas Revolution. In both cases, these confrontations served as the catalysts for a broader conflict and represented a definitive break from previous tensions into open war.
In contrast, the Treaty of Versailles marked the end of World War I rather than the beginning of a conflict. Pearl Harbor was indeed a surprise attack but took place in World War II, not World War I, and the Battle of Palmito Ranch occurred at the tail end of the Civil War, after the primary hostilities had ceased. Therefore, these options do not accurately mirror the circumstances of the Battle of Gonzales.