Register
In the the Dred Scott v Sanford case, the Supreme Court: A. said that African Americans enjoyed "no rights…" B. required the northern states to follow the Fugitive Slave Law. C. forbade the federal government
106k views
16 votes
In the the Dred Scott v Sanford case, the Supreme Court: A. said that African Americans enjoyed "no rights…" B. required the northern states to follow the Fugitive Slave Law. C. forbade the federal government from regulating slavery in the territories. D. said that laws interfering with property rights, including human property, were unconstitutional.

User Googol
by
4.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

A. said that African Americans enjoyed "no rights…"

Step-by-step explanation:

Court upheld slavery

declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional

denied the legality of black citizenship

sosmogov

User Moistbobo
by
3.3k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

3.5m questions

4.5m answers

Other Questions

Given several pollution sources within a given region. You have determined the level of pollutants that the environment can tolerate and need to design a regulatory system that guarantees that tis limit
A two-year-old child has a pet dog named Sophie. The child visits her neighbor and sees the neighbor's pet dog. Even though the neighbor's dog is larger and of a different color, the child points to it
Unilateral Contract:_________. A) Contract agreed to orally or in writing. B) Contract in which both parties make promises to perform; a promise is given in return for another's promise. C) A contract
A marker used to identify a person in a photo is called: A. a download B. a tag. C. TMI. D. "friending."
Why does laughter seem to qualify as a biological functions?
Link Copied!