110k views
3 votes
Question shown in the photo, don’t mind the unfinished answer in the text box

Question shown in the photo, don’t mind the unfinished answer in the text box-example-1

1 Answer

1 vote

Since the production of y must exceed the production of x by at least 100 units, we can write a second inequality:


y\ge x+100

Looking at the function P, we can see that the coefficient multiplying y is greater than the coefficient multiplying x, therefore increasing y instead of x will have a bigger increase in P.

But from the inequality x + 2y <= 1400, we can see that the "cost" of producing y is two times the "cost" of producing x, that is, for one y produced, we could have produced 2x instead.

The coefficient of y is greater, but it's not more than 2 times greater, therefore it's better to produce x than y.

Since y needs to be at least 100 more than x, let's choose the minimum amount of y to satisfy the inequalities:


\begin{gathered} x+2y\le1400\to x\le1400-2y \\ x+100\le y\to x\le y-100 \\ \\ 1400-2y=y-100 \\ y+2y=1400+100 \\ 3y=1500 \\ y=500 \\ x+100=500 \\ x=400 \end{gathered}

Therefore the values of x and y that give the maximum profit are x = 400 and y = 500.

Graphing the two inequalities, we have:

The feasible region is the intersection region (between red and blue).

The vertices are:

(0, 100), (400, 500), (0, 700).

Calculating the maximum profit (with vertex (400, 500)), we have:


\begin{gathered} P=14\cdot400+22\cdot500-900 \\ P=5600+11000-900 \\ P=15700 \end{gathered}

Therefore the production that yields the maximum profit is x = 400 and y = 500, and the maximum profit is P = 15700.

Question shown in the photo, don’t mind the unfinished answer in the text box-example-1
User Traffy
by
8.3k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories