90.9k views
5 votes
A video game company surveys a random sample of 250 gamers who reportannual income of $50,000. The company finds that the average gamerspends $206 a year on games, with a standard deviation of $12.Another company is also interested in the amount game consumers spend,and surveys a random sample of 225 gamers with a verified yearly income of$50,000. The company finds that the average gamer spends $250 a year ongames, with a standard deviation of $15.Why is the second survey more believable than the first?A. size of the sample for the second surveyB. size of the confidence interval for the second surveyC. likelihood of those in the first survey to lie about the amount theymakeD. lack of randomization in the first survey

User Quaternion
by
5.0k points

1 Answer

4 votes

From a random sample of 250 gamers with an anual income of $50000, it was obtained that the average gamer spends $206/year on games with a standard deviation of $12.

Sample 1

n₁=250

X[bar]₁=$206

S₁=$12

Another company took a random sample of 225 gamers with an anual income of $50000 and it was obtained that they spend on average $250/year and a standard deviation of $15

Sample 2

n₂=225

X[bar]₂=$250

S₂=$15

A. size of the sample

The greater the sample, the more accurate are the estimations you can make. The sample size of the first sample is greater than the size of the second sample. If you look only at this fact, the first sample should be more accurate.

B. size of the confidence intervals

Confidence intervals with smaller amplitude are considered to be more accurate than those with a greater amplitude. If you look at the formula for the margin of error of a confidence interval for the population mean, you'll notice that the sample size and the margin of error have an inverse relationship, this means that the greater the sample size, the smaller the margin of error and thus, the amplitude of the interval will be smaller


\downarrow d=Z_{\mleft\lbrace1-(\alpha)/(2)\mright\rbrace}\cdot\frac{S}{\sqrt[]{n}\uparrow}

Since


n_1>n_2

The amplitude of the interval for the first sample is expected to be smaller than the amplitude of the inverval for the second sample, so the CI for the first sample will be more accurate.

C. reliability of the data

The first video games company took the word of the gamers as true while the second company verified that they weren't lying about their annual income.

The information obtained by the second company is more reliable than the information obtained by the first company.

D. randomization

The text states that both companies took "random samples" so the randomization condition checks for both samples.

The reason why the second sample is more believable than the first one is because the data on the second sample was verified. Option C

User DEfusion
by
5.1k points