Final answer:
The statement in question is an example of deductive reasoning where a general statement leads to a specific conclusion. Deductive reasoning follows from general premises to specific, logically valid conclusions, whereas inductive reasoning is based on specific observations leading to generalizations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
The statement 'All peaches are fruits. All fruits have seeds. Therefore, all peaches have seeds.' is an example of deductive reasoning. In this type of reasoning, we start with a general statement or hypothesis and arrive at a specific conclusion. The reasoning process moves from a general premise to a specific prediction or conclusion that logically follows from the given premises. If the premises are true and the reasoning is correct, the conclusion must also be true.
On the other hand, inductive reasoning involves moving from specific observations to broader generalizations. For example, noticing that many fruits such as apples, bananas, and oranges grow on trees and then drawing a conclusion that all fruits grow on trees is inductive reasoning. This method of reasoning does not guarantee the truth of the conclusion, as it extrapolates beyond the information contained in the premises and is based on probability.
Deductive Reasoning in Science
In a scientific context, deductive reasoning is often used to test hypotheses. A hypothesis is posited, and then specific conclusions are drawn from it. An example, as stated earlier, would be 'All living things require energy to survive. Ducks are living things. Therefore, ducks require energy to survive.' This hypothesis, if correct, would lead to a logical conclusion.