Question

Which statement best evaluates the effectiveness of

the evidence in the passage?
O It effectively appeals to emotion and nationalism
with logical and anecdotal evidence of citizenship
trends that support the empire.
It ineffectively uses logical evidence because it is
not clear whether the immigration patterns verifiably
support decolonization.
O It effectively uses anecdotal evidence to verify the
immigration trends and the answer is there support the empire.
O It ineffectively uses anecdotal evidence because it
makes Canada seem powerful.

Answer 1

Answer: It effectively appeals to emotion and nationalism with logical and anecdotal evidence of citizenship trends that support the empire.

Explanation:

:)

Answer 2

It effectively appeals to emotion and nationalism with logical and anecdotal evidence of citizenship trends that support the empire.

Step-by-step explanation:

Got it right on ed. Also,

• it doesn't really make Canada seem more powerful
• The third option is out of the question
• The 2nd option may seem right but logical evidence is still evidence and is able to clear things up