Question

Ww1 aftermath

1. What are the pros (Yes) to holding Germany reponsible for damage to any country's land and buildings they damaged during WW I? List 3 pros:


2. What are the cons (No) to not holding Germany reponsible for damage to any country's land and buildings they damaged during WWI? List 3 pros:


3. Which side do you favor and why answer in 3-5 sentences:

Answer 1

1. a) The War Guilt Clause was added in order to get the French and Belgians to agree to reduce the sum of money that Germany would have to pay to compensate for war damage. The article was seen as a concession to the Germans by the negotiators. It was bitterly resented, however, by virtually all Germans who did not believe they were responsible for the outbreak of the war. This article was a constant thorn in the side of the Weimar leaders who tried to meet the terms of the agreement while trying to have these terms modified.

2: a) Its money is useless

Their country is in smaller space

The factor that germons are waste

3.) I have the favor of the cons because germans got more loss. They also are in poor. The german public is in needs.

Step-by-step explanation:

Thanks

I believe this helps