Answer:In the second reading, there are several pieces of evidence that support the claim that Los Angeles is treated as a commodity. Here are three examples: 1. One piece of evidence is the mention of Los Angeles being advertised and sold to the people of the United States. This suggests that the city is treated as a product that can be marketed and consumed. Similar to automobiles, cigarettes, and mouthwash, Los Angeles is presented as something that can be bought and enjoyed. 2. Another piece of evidence is the reference to the year 1888. By stating that Los Angeles has been treated as a commodity since this year, it implies that the commodification of the city has a long history. This further supports the idea that Los Angeles is not just a city, but a product that has been marketed and sold for a considerable period of time. 3. The third piece of evidence is the comparison between Los Angeles and automobiles, cigarettes, and mouthwash. By aligning the city with consumer goods, it emphasizes the idea that Los Angeles is seen as something that can be bought and consumed. This comparison helps to convey the notion that the city is not solely a place, but a commodity that can be marketed and sold. Overall, these three pieces of evidence from the second reading support the claim that Los Angeles is treated as a commodity. It is advertised and sold like other consumer goods, has a long history of commodification, and is compared to products such as automobiles, cigarettes, and mouthwash.
Step-by-step explanation: